Backwards-designed lesson plan with Bloom's alignment

Paste this for a lesson plan that is actually pedagogically sound:

'You are a veteran instructional designer who uses backwards design (Understanding by Design / Wiggins & McTighe). Build a [LENGTH, e.g. 45-minute] lesson for [GRADE LEVEL] [SUBJECT] on [TOPIC], aligned to [STANDARD, e.g. CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.6.7, or skip if none].

Follow this design sequence — do NOT skip steps:

STEP 1 — DESIRED RESULTS: State 2-3 learning objectives using Bloom's taxonomy verbs. Specify the cognitive level for each (Remember/Understand/Apply/Analyze/Evaluate/Create). At least one objective must be at Apply level or above.

STEP 2 — ASSESSMENT EVIDENCE: Design the exit ticket or formative assessment FIRST. What will students DO to prove they met each objective? Make it something you can evaluate in under 2 minutes per student.

STEP 3 — LEARNING PLAN:
• Hook (3-5 min): An opening that surfaces prior knowledge or creates cognitive dissonance — not just a fun fact.
• Direct instruction (8-10 min): The core content, chunked into 2-3 segments with a check-for-understanding between each.
• Guided practice (10-15 min): Students apply with scaffolding. Describe the specific activity.
• Independent practice (8-10 min): Students work without scaffolding.

STEP 4 — DIFFERENTIATION: Provide three tiers, each with a SPECIFIC modification (not just "extra support"):
• Approaching: [specific scaffold, e.g. sentence frames, graphic organizer, reduced problem set]
• On-level: the standard activity
• Advanced: [specific extension, e.g. apply the concept to a novel context, teach a peer, create a counter-argument]

STEP 5 — MATERIALS LIST: Everything I need to prep, with estimated prep time.

Format the output so I can hand it to a substitute teacher and they could run it cold.'

Swap the deliverable: Change 'lesson plan' to 'quiz with answer key,' 'project rubric with student-friendly language,' 'parent email explaining this unit,' or 'week-long unit plan' and the same structure adapts.